Serving Christ our Lord since 2006

Church of Faith
Internet & Mail Order Ordinations
10 Forest Street
Winchester, MA 01890
781-721-1955


"Your Rights Protected for Religious Freedom"

Church of Faith Links

Home

Contact Us - Prayer Request

Church of Faith Statement of Faith

Your Wedding Service

Bible College

Degree Programs

Church Store

Becoming An Ordained Minister

Application for Ordination

FAQ About Officiating Weddings

Legal Ruling Regarding
Mail Order/Internet Ordinations

 


 

 


 


 There are two areas in our laws here in the United States that protect your rights regarding religious freedom the first would be the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States and the second would be a court ruling regarding Ordinations by Mail


The Constitution

What does it say about . . RELIGIOUS FREEDOM!


Amendment 1

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

COMMENT: This is the part of the Constitution which gives legality to all free expression of religion, including Ordination by Mail. 


Amendment 14

1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

COMMENT: This provision basically reinforced that States may not interfere with our Constitutionally protected freedoms, including our free expression of religion.

5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

COMMENT: Congress most recently used this authority and passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993.

 

 

  

Ordination by Mail Ministry
vs
United States of America

freedom bell

 

In 1974 a ministry which ordained people in a simple manner by mail, and by other means, sued the United States Government. This suit was brought by the Universal Life Church and a visionary minister by the name of  Rev. Kirby J. Hensley. The suit was over taxes. However, when the Federal Judge ruled in the ministry's favor on taxes he also ruled on the legality of receiving ordination in a simple manner. We all owe this pioneer a debt of gratitude for his work against the government and the taxing authority thereof.


Here is part of the Federal Judge's decision concerning simple ordination and as a result of this Federal Judge's ruling ministries being started by mail ordained clergy (which includes internet ordinations also) have been flourishing both throughout the United States and other countries.

"The Court must then address itself to the defendant's second conclusion: that the ordination of ministers, the granting of church charters, and the issuance of Honorary Doctor of Divinity certificates by plaintiff are substantial activities which do not further any religious purpose. Certainly the ordination of ministers and the chartering of churches are accepted activities of religious organizations. The defendant impliedly admits that same on Page 5 of its Memorandum in Support of its Requested Instructions. The fact that the plaintiff distributed ministers credentials and Honorary Doctor of Divinity certificates is of no moment. Such activity may be analogized to mass conversions at a typical revival or religious crusade. Neither this Court, nor any branch of this Government, will consider the merits or fallacies of a religion. Nor will the Court compare the beliefs, dogmas, and practices of a newly organized religion with those of an older, more established religion. Nor will the Court praise or condemn a religion, however excellent or fanatical or preposterous it may seem. Were the Court to do so, it would impinge upon the guarantees of the First Amendment."

 

Copyright © 2008, 2009  Rev. Carl Welliver - Web Minister.
All Rights Reserved.